View Full Version : FTT Results
sadscopie
04-12-2006, 19:20
Anyone had them / know when they are going to be released?
sadscopie
05-12-2006, 18:55
Results will be on a scopie unit near you on Friday - apparently!
Ana-Prop
06-12-2006, 13:09
Is that for both exams?
Ana-Prop
06-12-2006, 13:12
I though the exam was tough but then I suppose getting promoted should be! Does anybody know anything about the follow on course. Is it yet again more theory?
Fearless Leader
06-12-2006, 15:52
Is that for both exams?
No, just FTT1.
The FTT2 results will probably be out in the New Year.
By the way, I used to be oldhamboy1967 - I like this name better and I couldn't seem to get back in after the site problems.
Ana-Prop
06-12-2006, 16:02
How difficult is it to mark multi choice. Its right or wrong. Thought I might have heard before christmas. Oh well thats life.
Ana-Prop
06-12-2006, 16:03
any thing on phase 2 ?
Fearless Leader
06-12-2006, 16:05
How difficult is it to mark multi choice. Its right or wrong. Thought I might have heard before christmas. Oh well thats life.
Papers have to come back from overseas, nuggets can't read the exam instructions, and each paper has to be mark one eyeballed - the online system is not going to be available for a while.
That's why it takes a while.
Fearless Leader
06-12-2006, 16:06
any thing on phase 2 ?
The practical "Applications" courses you mean?
Ana-Prop
06-12-2006, 16:10
Didnt know we had many overseas left. the applications course is there any news on it ? What did any one else think of FTT2 exam, I remember some gripes on FTT1 before the system crashed....
Fearless Leader
06-12-2006, 16:18
Didnt know we had many overseas left. the applications course is there any news on it ? What did any one else think of FTT2 exam, I remember some gripes on FTT1 before the system crashed....
But you've got OOA like the Falklands and Afghanistan, they still got to to sit the exam.
Applications courses should start from about April, ref gripes there's a meeting for UTMs in February. Drop me a PM if you need to know more.
sadscopie
06-12-2006, 18:24
Fearless, Am I right in saying that the pass rate was an abismal 12% or is that just the TG12 rumour mill working at full speed? Also, am I also right in saying that we will only get a pass/fail result? Will only the FTT oppos know the exact scores? That's assuming you know!
Cheers
holedweller
06-12-2006, 20:37
Fearless, Am I right in saying that the pass rate was an abismal 12% or is that just the TG12 rumour mill working at full speed? Also, am I also right in saying that we will only get a pass/fail result? Will only the FTT oppos know the exact scores? That's assuming you know!
Cheers
Apparently if you fail you will get a sheet explaining where you went wrong etc.
(probably another reason why its taking so long to mark).
I would be surprised if I have passed - I have had some other more important distractions to put up with recently.
I suspect that at least one of the wrong answers which you could have given was not incorrect in the real world, just not word for word as per the study material - getting an negative mark for that does not quite sit well with me.
More worringly for me though is that I think the module I did best in was the Ident one!!
As for the pass mark being only 12% I have heard 10% so its probably just a rumour.
LCMOTPET
06-12-2006, 22:20
12% pass rate.
Gotta feeling i will be in the 88% majority!!
Oh well always next April..and October
:PDT_Xtremez_28:
tourettes
07-12-2006, 10:06
Well holedweller. if you done well in the the ident module do you need a crystal ball to see what the future holds for you?
Fearless Leader
07-12-2006, 10:32
Just wait till they bring in FTT3! :PDT_Xtremez_19:
Ana-Prop
07-12-2006, 14:05
:PDT_Xtremez_03: 12 % oh thats low. Better start studying again. To be honest only picked it up the week before. That will teach me !!!
holedweller
07-12-2006, 15:14
Well holedweller. if you done well in the the ident module do you need a crystal ball to see what the future holds for you?
Having just been 'assigned' to a new post I am fortunate that I owe someone some beers for helping me side-step the CRCs for a couple of years - anyway I need to be promoted before that happens.
NotAnIDOYet
07-12-2006, 19:56
Sounds like a lot of people did not expect to fail the FTT1 exam, a legacy from FT 1 perhaps?
Under the old prom system failure was commonplace, with the usual reason being a lack of work from the individuals. Now I wouldn't dare to presume that this is the case now......
The question now is whether the trade is better served by having few people pass at this first attempt. Remember you are still promotable without passing until Jan 08, you still have to pass before FTT Apps (you need the prior knowlege)
FTT 3 may not be much of a joke, some of us are doing it at the moment (check my username). Maybe not to everyone's taste but certainly the future in some form or another.
sadscopie
07-12-2006, 20:14
Sounds like a lot of people did not expect to fail the FTT1 exam
Should you expect to fail? I hope I pass, however, I would never expect to fail!
Oh well - judgement day tomorrow!
Fearless Leader
08-12-2006, 12:20
So, it doesn't seem that bad and majority of those who did fail will only have to resit 1 or 2 modules. :PDT_Xtremez_30:
sadscopie
08-12-2006, 13:50
Apparently they have been sent today so should find out middle of next week.
Fearless Leader
08-12-2006, 14:09
Gave out mine to my guys this morning!
sadscopie
08-12-2006, 14:41
Gave out mine to my guys this morning!
Are you at CRC Alnwick though?
Fearless Leader
11-12-2006, 08:28
Are you at CRC Alnwick though?
I am in a location not far from that hive of industry that is the CRC!
sadscopie
11-12-2006, 13:05
I am in a location not far from that hive of industry that is the CRC!
LOL, I passed! Just need to get on the applications course now!
Never Alert
11-12-2006, 13:34
LOL, I passed! Just need to get on the applications course now!
Not forgetting the not so minor part of being placed on the PSL!?!
NotAnIDOYet
12-12-2006, 21:35
Well done to those who passed, comisserations to those who need to resit modules.
The system is not designed to be easy, those of us old enough to remember the Prom 1/2 system will testify that it is easier than that was...
Mmmmmm 500001D Annex Q, my mouth waters at the thought of a certain Mr Meach asking me questions on a night shift!!
sadscopie
12-12-2006, 23:25
Well done to those who passed, comisserations to those who need to resit modules.
The system is not designed to be easy, those of us old enough to remember the Prom 1/2 system will testify that it is easier than that was...
Mmmmmm 500001D Annex Q, my mouth waters at the thought of a certain Mr Meach asking me questions on a night shift!!
From what I'm led to believe you cannot really compare FTT to Promex. Although it (FTT) was vote for joe, you did have to study, and know your subject. The 4 possible answers would all feasible to the 'Guessers' amoungst the trade and this would catch most out, couple that with negative marking and you have a hell of a hard exam IMO. I think the negative marking may have had a big impact on the results, then again, You are only going to get through the SAC's / Cpl's that want the promotion but passing a theory exam does not make you a good manager.
Any other 'Old Skool' Scopies thoughts?
NotAnIDOYet
13-12-2006, 06:42
From what I'm led to believe you cannot really compare FTT to Promex. Although it (FTT) was vote for joe, you did have to study, and know your subject. The 4 possible answers would all feasible to the 'Guessers' amoungst the trade and this would catch most out, couple that with negative marking and you have a hell of a hard exam IMO. I think the negative marking may have had a big impact on the results, then again, You are only going to get through the SAC's / Cpl's that want the promotion but passing a theory exam does not make you a good manager.
Any other 'Old Skool' Scopies thoughts?
The aim of FT/FTT is not to turn you into a manager, it is to give you the necessary TRADE knowledge to progress into NCO roles. ACS is for management training and does it very well.
As for the comparison, both systems provide a hurdle to promotion, both involve exans (although I concede that the exam techniques differ) and both involve hard work and study for the candidate. Yes there are teething problems, fell free to give examples of anything that is right first time...
Never Alert
13-12-2006, 09:13
Yes there are teething problems, fell free to give examples of anything that is right first time...
That's very kind of you.
FTT does not work for two reasons:
1. There is no check of understanding at any stage. The trade sponsor cannot expect local training sections to take this task onboard as the workload would be massive at some units.
2. The exam does not follow objectives that were laid out in the theory handouts.
Although the CD was well put together, I could not help but suspect that the objectives for each module were added as an after thought. As it is RAF policy to for exams to be written from course objectives, the FTT exam did not really comply as many of the questions were pulled out of thin air.
Should the trade sponsor wish us all to retain all of the info on disc (nearly 1100 pages) then a structured course, probably about 1 month in duration should be run, allowing a constant check of understanding & consistency in teaching methods... Hang on a minute...
I believe that the applications course is going to be a complete waste of time when taking into account that it would be feasable for an airmen to pass FTT1 in 2006, whilst not gaining a place on a FTT1 Applications course until 2009/10.
The theory would need to be taught again, duplicating workload.
NotAnIDOYet
13-12-2006, 17:08
That's very kind of you.
FTT does not work for two reasons:
1. There is no check of understanding at any stage. The trade sponsor cannot expect local training sections to take this task onboard as the workload would be massive at some units.
2. The exam does not follow objectives that were laid out in the theory handouts.
Although the CD was well put together, I could not help but suspect that the objectives for each module were added as an after thought. As it is RAF policy to for exams to be written from course objectives, the FTT exam did not really comply as many of the questions were pulled out of thin air.
Should the trade sponsor wish us all to retain all of the info on disc (nearly 1100 pages) then a structured course, probably about 1 month in duration should be run, allowing a constant check of understanding & consistency in teaching methods... Hang on a minute...
I believe that the applications course is going to be a complete waste of time when taking into account that it would be feasable for an airmen to pass FTT1 in 2006, whilst not gaining a place on a FTT1 Applications course until 2009/10.
The theory would need to be taught again, duplicating workload.
Taking into account some of your points;
1. Surely the exam is a check of understanding in itself? The problem with the current FT is that it is a memory retention course, no real check of understanding occurs.
2. It is possible that the exam did not correctly mirror the objectives. If there was only a list of objectives on the CD, with an exam just on these, would that be any better?
The package was put together in a professional manner by people who took a great deal of time and effort in doing so. When the trade as a whole were asked to provide an opinion on what was coming, the majority welcomed it with open arms.
As for the applications course being a waste of time and reteaching theory, do you not think that there is an individual responsibility to do some pre-reading before the course? This used to happen on FT, with a pass/fail TOK on day 1. Failures were RTU'd with a bo11ocking about not being prepared!!
Your training section are not the only ones with training responsibilities, your line management NCOs have training of subordinates as a key responsibility. Any NCO who does not take this duty seriously is not worth the stripes they wear!!
Again feel free to give examples of any project that worked first time out (hence why it is not compulsory until Jan 08!!). Remember Murphy's first law of combat - No Plan survives first contact with the enemy!!
Rant over, enjoy the resits!
sadscopie
13-12-2006, 18:09
Again feel free to give examples of any project that worked first time out (hence why it is not compulsory until Jan 08!!).
So what is the bottom line as myself and a handful of others are still wondering about what happens next.
It is not compulsary until Jan 2008, that is to be boarded as I understand, so from now until Jan 08 you can be boarded without having sat the exam, however, yuo will be expected to pass the exam before the applications course - right? If you fail it's bye bye like the old days. For the ones that have passed the exam they will turn up for an applications course once they have been finalised, but again, as I understand it they won't be sorted out for a while (someone mentioned 2009?), in that case what happens to currently boarded candidates? Will they do an FT1/2 course and have to be 'Taught' lessons on subjects they have just studied for a year and have already passed?
NotAnIDOYet
13-12-2006, 19:34
Sadscopie,
I empathise with your position however the transition between systems is never easy, think Pay 2000, JPA, UCCS etc.
The current FT was not producing NCOs who were qualified to do anything, FTT Applications should be aiming to solve this, not by button crunching on UCCS but forcing prospective J/SNCOs into trade supervision/management issues.
A lot of the problem historically is Junior Officers, who see the trade as "assistants". By virtue of rank a Cpl is a supervisor and the apps course should put the candidate in situation where they have to "manage" trade problems (Battlespace management, communications etc).
It is tough for those caught in the middle, when we went from Promex to FT a lot of the trade had passed prom 1 to be told it didn't matter.
As I said earlier, no plan survives contact with the enemy, your pain now will help the powers that be develop the training packages for those who pass behind you. Tough for you I know but that is the way of the world, we learn from our mistakes and experiences.
Hold on tight, be proud of what you achieved if you passed and work on the modules you didn't pass (hate the word fail) for the resit. If you have genuine concerns with the conduct of the exam or the learning material then put it in writing to your line management, they will have to do something about it.
The trade is changing severely, along with the rest of the RAF. We are not the first to bring in this kind of system and we will not be the last. Dig in for the long haul, the system will improve if we give it a chance!
Not An IDO...YET!!!
sadscopie
13-12-2006, 19:45
If you have genuine concerns with the conduct of the exam or the learning material then put it in writing to your line management, they will have to do something about it.
I have not got any problems with the exam, on the contrary, I thought it was fine, I just wanted to clarify what would happen in the transition period.
Never Alert
13-12-2006, 20:55
Not an IDO... Yet,
You could also say that if it isn't broken, don't try and fix it.
FT1 & 2 provided a high workload, forced course members to improve on their time management & pushed their trade knowledge up to the next level.
The Apps course is going to be very generic, it has to be, due to the wide spectrum of tasks a JNCO or SNCO may be asked to undertake for example, a SNCO at BMEWS carries out tasks that bear no relation to that of a SNCO at MSW.
I appreciate that the courses may have been becoming dated however, the key issue, IMHO, is the lack of a check of understanding & no real objectivity to the FTT theory literature & that is of real concern to me. If we can introduce some sort of COU then I'm sure this will work well. The big positive is the requirement for self motivation, that'll weed a few people out...
Good luck with the rest of your course, A's on P's & all that!
I've been sitting at home revising my ICAOs, reporting points, NASP & all the rest of it for January's course. Looking forward to it!
NotAnIDOYet
13-12-2006, 21:05
Not an IDO... Yet,
You could also say that if it isn't broken, don't try and fix it.
FT1 & 2 provided a high workload, forced course members to improve on their time management & pushed their trade knowledge up to the next level.
The Apps course is going to be very generic, it has to be, due to the wide spectrum of tasks a JNCO or SNCO may be asked to undertake for example, a SNCO at BMEWS carries out tasks that bear no relation to that of a SNCO at MSW.
I appreciate that the courses may have been becoming dated however, the key issue, IMHO, is the lack of a check of understanding & no real objectivity to the FTT theory literature & that is of real concern to me. If we can introduce some sort of COU then I'm sure this will work well. The big positive is the requirement for self motivation, that'll weed a few people out...
Good luck with the rest of your course, A's on P's & all that!
I've been sitting at home revising my ICAOs, reporting points, NASP & all the rest of it for January's course. Looking forward to it!
The COA is the apps course, you will need the knowledge then.
As for the course being generic, that is the nature of the beast! The aim of the course is to produce J/SNCOs that can deploy OOA with JFACC, AOCC (L), 1ACC and the like. The UK is just a training ground (with the obvious exception of MT2.4).
You also cannot get more objective than multiple choice questions, no grey areas, right or wrong. Too many people, myself included, waffled on in FT exams in the past.
The FTT literature was produced in consultation with what industry would call the "End User", in otherwords the Units. Most of the source material is the AP3430, also written by the Units.
When the RAF as a whole are crying out for personnel that can do the whole BSM thing then we are ideally placed to gain some posts out in the "Sandpit" with the rest of our bretheren. No other trade group provides this type of training to their airmen and indeed some are coming to us for training prior to OOA.
And the next person to tell me its just "A's on P's" is getting their throat ripped out!
Weapons Monkey I presume?
Never Alert
14-12-2006, 17:26
When the RAF as a whole are crying out for personnel that can do the whole BSM thing then we are ideally placed to gain some posts out in the "Sandpit" with the rest of our bretheren. No other trade group provides this type of training to their airmen and indeed some are coming to us for training prior to OOA.
And the next person to tell me its just "A's on P's" is getting their throat ripped out!
Weapons Monkey I presume?
I see your point mate & I completely agree however, it is the lack of CHECK OF UNDERSTANDING that is the problem. The exam did not fully follow the objectives laid out in the theory handouts & to be inline with RAF policy, it should have.
If we can nail down the questions to stay in line with objectives & have some sort of COU then I think we have a winner.
A's on P's, I thought you'd bite at that, MK certainly did, every time, only ever said in jest. Not knocking the IDO course matey, I don't suspect for one minute that it's easy & yes, I am going weapons, I like the sound of the job & it's time to choose my career path before they promote me & make me a DLM or TACRO!!!
I think I've got you whittled down to a possibility of 3 people at the moment, 2 of them a rugby lads (probably just watching it these days) & other was never seen at the gym at Buchan, a 'bar athlete'.
Scots-scopie
15-12-2006, 19:05
How true is it that the objectives were only put in because the sponser wanted them in and not the ones who actually wrote the question paper?
sadscopie
15-12-2006, 20:03
How true is it that the objectives were only put in because the sponser wanted them in and not the ones who actually wrote the question paper?
It doesn't matter who put them there, we were all briefed to ignore the objectives and study everything.
i wasnt briefed to ignore the objectives and revise everything! i was told stick to the objectives as they wont ask anything outside of this i studied every single night for a min of 3 hours got in there and half of it i didnt even recognise... how happy was i, plus i still havent got my results i seem to be the only one
holedweller
17-12-2006, 23:20
i wasnt briefed to ignore the objectives and revise everything! i was told stick to the objectives as they wont ask anything outside of this i studied every single night for a min of 3 hours got in there and half of it i didnt even recognise... how happy was i, plus i still havent got my results i seem to be the only one
Agreed, in fact the words 'Objective based testing' was mentioned at one of the brief's I attended.
And no your not the only one with out results, and I'm not expecting to get mine for another week, maybe.
Never Alert
18-12-2006, 10:37
Agreed, in fact the words 'Objective based testing' was mentioned at one of the brief's I attended.
At 1ACC, we were briefed that the exam would be objectives based. Only after the SAC exam had sat, did we discover that this was not the case. I witnessed lots of preparation for the exams from all of the guys & I just hope they got through, it would be a great shame to see them let down by poor guidance from the road show.
Scots-scopie
18-12-2006, 14:22
I dont even have my exam marks back yet, in fact ,none of my section do
LCMOTPET
18-12-2006, 15:51
Woo Hoo,:PDT_Xtremez_30:
Just got my FTT2 results..see above
Oh well i did about 4 hours revision and did paper in 50 Mins so to be expected really.
Forget Apr 07 probably have another crack in Oct 07.
Didnt realise that if you fail 1 or 2 modules you only have to resit them instead of whole exam again.
Would have been nice to have known that 6 months ago!!
Still Merry Christmas everyone. Ho Ho Ho
YES!!!!!! Got my results and ive passed thank fook!!!! nice to know what my score was on each module and overall percentage instead of just being told i passed (never happy)... anyone know a way of finding out?????
Never Alert
18-12-2006, 19:30
YES!!!!!! Got my results and ive passed thank fook!!!! nice to know what my score was on each module and overall percentage instead of just being told i passed (never happy)... anyone know a way of finding out?????
Unlucky LCMOTPET, don't worry about it too much, it doesn't count for the upcoming board anyway.
Well done Playboy, good effort.
I'm off work at the moment & have no interest in chasing the result until after the grant. If I've failed it, I'll do it again in Oct if need be.
Good luck to the rest of you!
NotAnIDOYet
18-12-2006, 21:50
YES!!!!!! Got my results and ive passed thank fook!!!! nice to know what my score was on each module and overall percentage instead of just being told i passed (never happy)... anyone know a way of finding out?????
Won't happen until the new yearnow (so a little bird from that office tells me!!). They need to get the paperwork raised etc.
Well done to those that passed, commiserations to those who did not - never fear, take it on the chin and have another go in April
Never Alert
20-12-2006, 14:36
Having just been 'assigned' to a new post I am fortunate that I owe someone some beers for helping me side-step the CRCs for a couple of years - anyway I need to be promoted before that happens.
Colorado?
If you are who I think you are then enjoy the States matey.
holedweller
24-12-2006, 16:36
I wish....
Ana-Prop
24-12-2006, 17:36
Will have to wait until the new year to find out my result ,but if it not a pass then the only person I can really blame is myself and not the people who put the package together. No point moaning about it anfd trying to pass the buck - will just have to try harder. Oh well maybe change tune in New Year... until then
Wishing All A Very Scopie Christmas especially those not at home with loved ones.
does anyone know how many people they are looking at promoting this year from the last sac to cpl board and when the first applications course is?
sadscopie
07-01-2007, 14:44
does anyone know how many people they are looking at promoting this year from the last sac to cpl board and when the first applications course is?
36 apparently, however, no courses have been announced.
sorry for asking the same old thing again... but im asking for two reasons... 1) i have phoned the desk and got told to wait another month as they know nothing, and i thought that people at the sfc would probably know if any courses are going to be taking place any time soon and might be able to say on here, even if it is just a rough timeline??? and secondly there hasnt been a post on here for over a week. are people not using this site anymore????
sadscopie
21-01-2007, 11:24
sorry for asking the same old thing again... but im asking for two reasons... 1) i have phoned the desk and got told to wait another month as they know nothing, and i thought that people at the sfc would probably know if any courses are going to be taking place any time soon and might be able to say on here, even if it is just a rough timeline??? and secondly there hasnt been a post on here for over a week. are people not using this site anymore????
I have heard that May-ish time there MIGHT be a course but that's hear-say. As for promotions, apparently they are "still deciding" how many to promote.
NotAnIDOYet
21-01-2007, 20:11
number selected does not equal number promoted - can be more, can be less!
SFC do not know when courses are, they are told by PMA/C2 Spt to run a course so they do.
Hope this helps
Scots-scopie
10-02-2007, 11:19
I been away for a while so sorry for asking this age old question..but has anyone heard what happening with the promotions and if any courses have been notified..not that i will get one hehehe:PDT_Xtremez_30:
sadscopie
10-02-2007, 12:59
I been away for a while so sorry for asking this age old question..but has anyone heard what happening with the promotions and if any courses have been notified..not that i will get one hehehe:PDT_Xtremez_30:
Not spoke to the desk but I saw in the PMB that as of June the Trade will be -29 JNCO and +64 AC's so you would expect (LOL) there to be around 30-35 promotions.
Ana-Prop
01-03-2007, 13:17
With the upcoming exams has anybody figured out this negative marking stuff. I think that is what messed me up the last time, well that and not knowing the answers. Need to pass both of the modules I failed on or else I am going to have to take the whole lot again. I need to get studying but cant seem to get motivated. Good luck all.
With the upcoming exams has anybody figured out this negative marking stuff. I think that is what messed me up the last time, well that and not knowing the answers. Need to pass both of the modules I failed on or else I am going to have to take the whole lot again. I need to get studying but cant seem to get motivated. Good luck all.
Negative marking is not a problem providing you have done your revision. However, as you have not even started revising 5 months into a 6 month study period, you need all the luck you can get! Ah well, there is always October!
NotAnIDOYet
01-03-2007, 19:50
With the upcoming exams has anybody figured out this negative marking stuff. I think that is what messed me up the last time, well that and not knowing the answers. Need to pass both of the modules I failed on or else I am going to have to take the whole lot again. I need to get studying but cant seem to get motivated. Good luck all.
Not knowing the answers would be a problem even in a positive marking scheme!!
Negative marking will weed out those that guess, you are given a score to start with and lose marks for wrong answers and guesses.
I guess you never attended the Review Team's briefings on the subject??
Ana-Prop
02-03-2007, 08:06
What review team ?
NotAnIDOYet
02-03-2007, 19:48
What review team ?
The erm, Trade Review Team, you know, the ones that administer the FTT!!
Ana-Prop
03-03-2007, 15:57
OK I know who you mean. Who do they work for ? the School ? or are they independant ?. Do they also run the TMS system. Good FTT section on there with reference documents.
NotAnIDOYet
04-03-2007, 10:46
They run TMS for C2 Spt and also administer FTT on their behalf
anyone know when the first ftt1 is being held??????? i heard the ftt2 is in may
Ana-Prop
03-04-2007, 16:26
I heard that as well ! when was the last FT1 course anyway ? however I am more concerned about the exam in a couple of weeks. Anybody know whats on the course ? or even better the exam paper ?
I heard that as well ! when was the last FT1 course anyway ? however I am more concerned about the exam in a couple of weeks. Anybody know whats on the course ? or even better the exam paper ?
I've heard that there's not going to be an FTT1 course for at least a year, too many Cpls. I know what is on the exam paper... The Exam Questions!!!
sadscopie
05-04-2007, 12:50
I've heard that there's not going to be an FTT1 course for at least a year, too many Cpls. I know what is on the exam paper... The Exam Questions!!!
I heard through that there is to be a course in June. The PMB states that there will be a deficit of 29 Cpl's and Overborne by 64 AC's as of Jun/July so you would expect at least some promotions, unless that is they are scrapping loads of Cpl slots?
Never Alert
06-04-2007, 20:07
I heard through that there is to be a course in June. The PMB states that there will be a deficit of 29 Cpl's and Overborne by 64 AC's as of Jun/July so you would expect at least some promotions, unless that is they are scrapping loads of Cpl slots?
I'm aware of two people who have been told that they will probably be on a course in June.
I doubt PMA will announce anything until after the resits this month. There may be people who are high up on the PSL who, subject to passing the resit, will be offered a slot. Hence the lack on info at the moment.
Rule of thunb is simple: as long as there are FTT2 courses, FTT1 courses will follow.
NotAnIDOYet
07-04-2007, 20:23
I'm aware of two people who have been told that they will probably be on a course in June.
I doubt PMA will announce anything until after the resits this month. There may be people who are high up on the PSL who, subject to passing the resit, will be offered a slot. Hence the lack on info at the moment.
Rule of thunb is simple: as long as there are FTT2 courses, FTT1 courses will follow.
Jings and crivens, a controller type talking sense!!
Only kidding, Never ALert is quite correct in his assumption. However if the Air Battle Management trade/branch happens then things could wildly change, not necessarily for the better!!
Watch this space....
Never Alert
11-04-2007, 08:01
Jings and crivens, a controller type talking sense!!
Jazz Hands...
Anyone know when the FTT 1 Exam results are out? I heard it was marked earlier this week. Anybody else out there nervous??
NotAnIDOYet
03-05-2007, 17:37
Anyone know when the FTT 1 Exam results are out? I heard it was marked earlier this week. Anybody else out there nervous??
No point being nervous, you have either done enough work to pass, or you haven't!
Seriously though, good luck to those awaiting results either 1 or 2.
vBulletin® v3.8.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.